Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Thursday, January 26, 2006
So Simon Comes Out
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Who Benefits?
Anyone who has been through the system knows it is not as easy as many claim to be classed as unable to perform any work. I was kicked off IB shortly after being retired on medical grounds despite having a report from a Harley Street psychiatrist specialising in Occupational Health stating I was currently unfit for any form of work and permanently unfit for my job. The assessors thought I could probably manage a job such as stacking in a supermarket. I have represently people whose only ability was that they could stand and lost their cases on the grounds that they "could be a lift operator".
It is very difficult to get a job when you have physical and mental disabilities. The Job Centre is worse than useless. Al they have done for me is give me a reading, writing and arithmatic test - helpful to assess someone who has held a responsible post involving many writing skills etc. for many years. They then decided I must have undertaken office administration tasks in the past (I used to type (two fingered) my own letters....) so sent me for a stream of office administrators posts. Funnily, never got past the application stage.
Now, to a degree I don't care about my personal problems with the system. I only claim NI credit, no actual money at all. But if I did not have an decent pension, I could be in a system that would pay me an amount that would be totally inadequate for normal life or force me into a job that may well bring about a total mental collapse. And that is clearly what will happen to many people.
Thursday, January 19, 2006
I know nothing...
Now our leaders have claimed they've never heard of it. But now it appears that The Foreign Secretary's Office and the Prime Minister's Office were well aware of the issue, but didn't tell their political masters.
So what are we to make of it all? People are flown around for questioning, despite there being a quite adequate facility at Guantanamo Bay- why? British politicians say they know even when their offices do. And anyway, at the end of the day Condoleezza Rice says its OK. So that's that then. Probably not!
Saturday, January 14, 2006
Respect - what?
Oddly, neither Respect or their bedfellows The SWP seem to have much to say about it.
Thursday, January 12, 2006
Over to you Voltaire
He is being investigated under either the telecommunications laws or the 1986 Public Order Act, which forbids the use of "threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress or thereby".
Firstly, I must say I deplore Sir Iqbal's views. But should he be allowed to express such opinions? Part of me says of course he should or freedom of speech and views means nothing. However, what if it had been the BNP saying this? I object to giving them the "oxygen of publicity" and would prefer to see them silenced. Sounds like I'm in danger of being a bit hypocritical here! It will be interesting to see the left's response to this.
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
The Compass Points to Money For????
The Chairman, Sir Francis Mackay, got shares worth £730,000 on top of his "salary" of £546,000 and a pension top-up of £1 million.
A number of other board members also made huge sums of money. Source - The Guardian
Apparently, the payments were there as an incentive for managers.
Wonder what the workers got as an incentive. Ahh, here it is It has drawn up plans to cut benefits to pension scheme members.
Monday, January 09, 2006
What IS she talking about?
RUTH KELLY ON 5 LIVE YESTERDAY Ruth Kelly: In 1998 we outlawed in primary legislation the ability to elect by academic ability. Nicky Campbell: Yes, so schools will never be able to admit on academic ability . . . just on sporting ability and musical ability and other abilities? That makes no sense. RK: If you say that 10 per cent, one in ten of . . . er . . . pupils at a school have some talent in sport of music or art . . . er . . . and then that the school builds up an expertise which it then shares and has to be able to share by sharing teachers and facilities and so forth with other neighbouring schools. I think people think that that is just sensible . . . NC: What if 10 per cent have a particular ability in Latin and French and history — what is the difference? RK: Well you know we’re talking about an 11 plus system . . . NC: I didn’t mention the 11 plus at all. RK: Well academic . . . er . . . selection by academic ability . . . er . . . generally is on a system that you either pass . . . er . . . or fail, that you are either seen as a success or written off as a failure. I think that is totally divisive, I would never want to go back to that sort of system, completely different to the Conservatives, who now say . . . er . . . that the main difference between them and us is that they want to see a . . . er . . . school able to select by academic ability. Instead what we are doing is saying that schools ought to play to their strengths . . .
Friday, January 06, 2006
Value of Words
- Abraham Lincoln - Character is like a tree and reputation its shadow. The shadow is what we think it is; the tree is the real thing.
- George Bush - When Iraq is liberated, you will be treated, tried, and persecuted as a war criminal.
- Tony Blair - I never know, although I use the term myself occasionally, quite what people mean when they talk about multiculturalism.
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
Here We Go Again?
What will be interesting to see is whether there will be a drip feed of nuclear/WMD stories about Iran. It is hard to see that public opinion is going to be swayed towards taking action against Iran. But a significant number of us did not support action against Iraq, even when presented with the "incontrovertable" evidence of WMDs, so whether public support means much remains to be seen.
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
Welcome to 2006
It appears that all the major party leaders are at odds with their own parties. Blair's worshipping of the market is alienating his backbenches. The boy Dave seems to have kept his backbenches together but his core support does not seem to sure. Melanie Phillips in The Daily Mail bemoans "This leaves millions of natural conservatives effectively disenfranchised...." And poor Charlie seems to have every Lib-Dem trying to put a knife in his back.
Where that leaves us (us being what is usually called the "loony left" i.e. the people who kept the hope of socialism alive during Thatcher's reign of terror) I am not sure - the bizarre coalition of the SWP and George Galloway? And... well that's about it!

